<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bonds to Oakland? Maybe not so much&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natnotes.com/2006/11/18/bonds-to-oakland-maybe-not-so-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natnotes.com/2006/11/18/bonds-to-oakland-maybe-not-so-much/</link>
	<description>Accept no imitations!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: NobodySpecial</title>
		<link>http://natnotes.com/2006/11/18/bonds-to-oakland-maybe-not-so-much/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>NobodySpecial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notesfromthenat.com/?p=216#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Thanks, and please breakdown what you think about some of them, because as we all know the Top 50 does not always depict the top 50 based on talent, there are some in there due to the money they recieved, not the tools they posess at this time (but hopefully someday down the road they are expected to have.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, and please breakdown what you think about some of them, because as we all know the Top 50 does not always depict the top 50 based on talent, there are some in there due to the money they recieved, not the tools they posess at this time (but hopefully someday down the road they are expected to have.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oz</title>
		<link>http://natnotes.com/2006/11/18/bonds-to-oakland-maybe-not-so-much/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notesfromthenat.com/?p=216#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I'll get around to it, but for now I'm catching up on a lot of transferring of old content to the new site.

On an aisde, I found a rich source of imagery of Vancouver ball teams from the 1900-1915 era, which I hope to get scanned and online shortly, being as there isn't much info about those teams (the Horse Doctors, Beavers, Bees etc) online at the moment.

And yeah, I'll get to the Scout Top 50 too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll get around to it, but for now I&#8217;m catching up on a lot of transferring of old content to the new site.</p>
<p>On an aisde, I found a rich source of imagery of Vancouver ball teams from the 1900-1915 era, which I hope to get scanned and online shortly, being as there isn&#8217;t much info about those teams (the Horse Doctors, Beavers, Bees etc) online at the moment.</p>
<p>And yeah, I&#8217;ll get to the Scout Top 50 too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NobodySpecial</title>
		<link>http://natnotes.com/2006/11/18/bonds-to-oakland-maybe-not-so-much/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>NobodySpecial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notesfromthenat.com/?p=216#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Hey OZ, when are you going to post the Oakland Top 50 Prospects that they are listing on Scout.com that the rest of the general public doesn't get to see but would like to know what's goin on.

Hope to see it up here soon,
Thanx U Much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey OZ, when are you going to post the Oakland Top 50 Prospects that they are listing on Scout.com that the rest of the general public doesn&#8217;t get to see but would like to know what&#8217;s goin on.</p>
<p>Hope to see it up here soon,<br />
Thanx U Much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
